RBAC vs. RBAC96

Casbin RBAC und RBAC96

This page compares Casbin’s RBAC with the RBAC96 model. Casbin supports the main RBAC96 ideas and adds domains and flexible permissions.

RBAC96	Casbin support	Notes
RBAC0	✅ Full	Users, roles, permissions and their relationships.
RBAC1	✅ Full	Role hierarchy (e.g. alice→role1→role2).
RBAC2	⚠️ Partial	Constraint-style handling (e.g. deny-override) via policy effect. No quantitative limits.
RBAC3	⚠️ Partial	RBAC1 + RBAC2; constraints as above, no quantitative limits.

Differences from RBAC96

1. User vs. role

Casbin does not separate “user” and “role” in the type system—both are strings. So:

p, admin, book, read
p, alice, book, read
g, amber, admin

GetAllSubjects() returns both users and roles that appear as subjects in policy ([admin alice]). GetAllRoles() returns only the right-hand side of g rules ([admin]). So Casbin infers the distinction from usage; for strict separation use a naming convention (e.g. user::alice, role::admin).

2. Permissions

RBAC96 fixes seven permission types. In Casbin, permissions are arbitrary strings (e.g. read, write, approve), so you can match your app.

3. Domains

Casbin supports RBAC with domains, so roles and permissions can be scoped per tenant or domain—beyond the standard RBAC96 model.